Is ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise) compliant with the EU AI Act?
Short answer: it depends on how you use it. The Act does not certify tools as “compliant”. It classifies each use into a risk tier, and your obligations follow from there.
For most general productivity uses this sits at minimal-risk, where only AI literacy (Article 4) applies. Customer-facing or decision-making uses can raise the tier.
What this means for you
If your organisation uses ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise) in the EU, you are a deployer. Inventory the system, write down what you use it for, and classify that use. Then handle the obligations that apply: AI literacy for everyone, transparency for customer-facing use, and the heavier high-risk duties only where an Annex III purpose is involved.
How Veillo classifies ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise)
Common ways this tool is used, and the tier each points to in Veillo’s catalog. Reviewed entries are checked by counsel; the rest are pending review.
- Output is for internal use and a person reviews it before it goes out.
- If you publish AI-generated content, Article 50 labelling may also apply.
How productivity tools tend to land
Typical use-case patterns in this category, and the tier each one points to. Your actual tier depends on how you use ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise).
This page is general information, not a classification of your specific deployment, and not legal advice. Run the free diagnosis to classify your actual use of ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise).
Classify your use of ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise), free.
Add ChatGPT (Team / Enterprise) and your other tools, tell us what you use them for, and get a classified register in minutes. No signup.
14-day trial of Business · no card · see pricing